The Insider's Guide to Next-Generation BPM
By John Hamilton, Senior Architect, Process Infrastructure, Computer Sciences Corporation , 04/05/2004
Print this article
Email this article
Talk Back!
Write to Editor
The most embarrassing moment in my education was when I realized that I would never be able to understand the Hamiltonian. Or even what it was for. There it was, named after me (sort of) and it was on the other side of a wall I could never climb. Mind you, I did learn enough of the practical sort of mathematics to realize that you could do some useful stuff with it. I also learned that there was a lot more than the Hamiltonian on the other side of that wall. All that useful stuff taught me the value of symbolic representations, formal methods and so on: that they can be used to do real work in the real world.
The other day I encountered the calculi of business processes: the l one and the p one. For me, just like most everyone else, they’re on the other side of that wall. However, I picked up on the idea because I remembered the value of formal methods, particularly when dealing with computers and real world problems. As an aside here, I really like Java and, especially when you include the class library, it has to be one of the least formal languages. You may be able to do a lot, but even its best friends wouldn’t call it concise. One of the most concise languages is APL: 136 primitive operators and no precedence, let alone input/output. But, returning to the point, the purpose of formality in language is the ability to produce a minimal complete system of representation.
Minimal because, like most of humanity, I’m thoroughly lazy and don’t want to have to understand multiple ways of doing things (the Windows class libraries spring to mind here). Not only is there more to learn, but you then waste even more time trying to choose the best way of doing things. Whatever it is. Obviously, it also has to be complete. Why invest all that learning effort only to find that you can’t use it as you want to. So my ideal system of representation has a formal basis and is minimal and complete. Incidentally, the world’s most successful language, English, is neither formal not minimal, but is certainly complete.
There’s another attribute I desire. Remember the success of SQL: a public domain standard. Remember the success of the PC: horrible design, but published and therefore copied, to the detriment of (so I’m told) a manifestly superior one. So if I’m going to invest my time and effort, I want to use a public domain standard. (I make exceptions with things like Java, which is almost public domain.) The lessons of the Open Source projects are obvious and relevant. They are the only real threat to the dominance of Microsoft. They are successful because a vast number of people, who care, are involved. The sheer amount of intellectual horsepower available within the open source community can, and is, beating anything that any single supplier can deploy. So, in my opinion, if and when a public domain standard becomes supported by the open source community, it will be unbeatable.
-1-
Best Practices in Moving Processes to the Clouds
How Can the Cloud Fit Into Your Applications Strategy?
Cloud Data Integration Best Practices
The Economics of Cloud Computing
Data Services Insight: Successful implementation of Canonical Information Models
Business Process Assurance: Ensuring Critical Business Processes Are Executed Without Disruption 
The Mobile Channel: Where Do Companies Start?
How to Empower Your Business Innovators to Make the Most of Business Process Management
Automating a Purchase Requisition Process with BPM
Pegasystems Makes Rare Deal, Buys Chordiant for $161.5m
BPM VIEWPOINT: Are You Asking Yourself the Hard Questions about BPM in Today's Economy?
ebizQ editorial highlights and updates, compiled by Site Editor Anne Stuart
March 10, 2011
The sixth annual BPM in Action 2011 Virtual Conference will explore cutting-edge market developments in BPM and describe how to leverage them for improved business operation and performance. More
Date:Apr 07, 2010
Time:13:00 PM
ET- (17:00 GMT)
Date:Apr 07, 2010
Time:12:00 PM
ET- (16:00 GMT)
In part two of Joe McKendrick's recent podcast with Miko Matsumura, chief strategist for Software AG, they talk about how SOA and IT systems need to change and grow and adapt with the organization around it.
Listen Now
Phil Wainewright interviews David Vap, VP of products at RightNow Technologies, and finds out how sharing best practices can help businesses understand how best to engage with online communities.
Listen Now
Scott Hebner, Vice President of Marketing and Strategy for IBM Rational, discusses a topic on the top of every company's mind today: getting the most from IT investments.
Listen Now
In BI, this tough economy and the increasing role of Web 2.0 and MDM are certainly topics on people's minds today. WiseAnalytics' Lyndsay Wise addresses each of them in this informative podcast.
Listen Now
Deepak Singh, President and CTO of Adeptia, joins ebizQ's Dennis Byron in a podcast that gets its hand around the trend of industry-specific BPM.
Listen NowSmart event processing can help your company run smarter and faster. This comprehensive guide helps you research the basics of complex event processing (CEP) and learn how to get started on the right foot with your CEP project using EDA, RFID, SOA, SCADA and other relevant technologies. Learn More
A lot of people are talking about Enterprise 2.0 as being the business application of Web 2.0 technology. However, there's still some debate on exactly what this technology entails, how it applies to today's business models, and which components bring true value. Some use the term Enterprise 2.0 exclusively to describe the use of social networking technologies in the enterprise, while others use it to describe a web economy platform, or the technological framework behind such a platform. Still others say that Enterprise 2.0 is all of these things. Learn More
|
|
This new publication from our sister site SearchSOA.com explores workflow, business activity monitoring (BAM) and complex event processing (CEP) issues. |
|
|
