With an eye toward bulking up its emerging SOA business, Software AG is offering
roughly $550 million in cash to buy webMethods. The obvious rationale is getting
critical mass. According to Gartner numbers, the combined entitys SOA
business would trail only that of IBM and Tibco respectively.
My colleague Jason Bloomberg of ZapThink pronounces this huge news,
characterizing this as a market share play and an SOA play entirely.
He concludes that Larry Ellison is not going to be happy about this news.
On paper this looks like a great deal. Both companies SOA lines were
incomplete, webMethods needed deeper pockets and put itself in play (it evidently
entertained several potential offers), and Software AG had a bed of cash to
make it happen.
A few more details: while Software AG is about 2 3x the size of webMethods,
its SOA business is barely a quarter of the size. Both companies geographic
footprints are almost mirror images: While Software AGs customer base
is 56% Europe and 25% North America, webMethods presence is 62% in North
America and 26% in Europe. And, excluding registry/repository (the stepping
stones for SOA governance), and a more sensitive area around BPM (Business Process
Management), there are few product overlaps.
In some respects this is a tail of two cities: Software AG, with an annuity
legacy business, seeking to jumpstart growth in SOA where it sees its future.
webMethods, with the more substantial SOA portfolio, which has been struggling
to reinvent itself from its B2B/EAI roots. In a bit of irony (and to show the
devaluation of IT dollars in the post dot com era), the company sold itself
for less than half what it paid back in 1999 for Active Software, the EAI company
that was supposed to be webMethods future.
In the past five years, webMethods has been through belt tightening and roughly
a half dozen acquisitions. And a year ago, it looked like it was starting to
get its old groove back with 12% profits. But in the next three quarters (Q4
numbers should come out any day), webMethods sank back into the red, which CEO
David Mitchell blamed on poor sales execution and gaps in its SOA offerings.