Untitled Document
In May 2008, a BusinessWeek study indicated that organizations realize
greater returns when business intelligence (BI) tools are accessible across
the enterprise. Specifically, the report found that the most significant return
on investment (ROI) comes from extending these tools to the employees on the
front lines, such as telemarketers and collections staff. And, when implemented
successfully, BI investments provide organizations with 2.4 times the market
returns of other businesses in their industry.
So, if it is simply a matter of making BI more widely accessible, why isn't
it common practice? Like most technology decisions in business, there is not
one simple answer. While some reasons involve cultural, structural or other
company-specific attributes, there are several universal reasons why companies
do not give broader access to information. Understanding these reasons will
help explain why the vast majority of BI solutions -- 87 percent, according
to a 2007 NCC BI Rapid Survey Report -- fail to meet original expectations and,
therefore, become a source of frustration rather than ROI. Most notably among
these are the limited integration of key data sources, concerns of security
and compliance issues involved in information sharing, and the difficulty of
the front-line personnel to use these overly complex systems in a meaningful
way.
A single source of truth
Access to mission-critical data throughout an enterprise is essential in order
to fully leverage investments in information systems. Today, the data integrated
by most BI solutions is drawn primarily from central repositories like ERP and
CRM systems. Organizations relying on these systems of record often overlook
the data stored in secondary stores, such as personal spreadsheets, departmental
databases and other ad hoc or shadow systems that likely reside on individual
users' desktops. While general-ledger data is essential, the data locked within
these secondary systems often carries equivalent importance for decision-makers.
Without complete data transparency across both secondary and primary data repositories,
several problems can arise. Most frequently, organizations see accounting discrepancies
and errors. Personnel shifts also highlight problems, where the individual responsible
for managing that system leaves the organization without clearly outlining how
to access and make sense of the data within it. In some very unfortunate situations,
lack of transparency opens up opportunity for fraud and regulatory consequences.
Above all, limiting a decision maker's access to only primary data sources provides
an incomplete picture of the data and denies that individual the mission-critical
information that can lead to better strategic insights and actions.
-1-