We use cookies and other similar technologies (Cookies) to enhance your experience and to provide you with relevant content and ads. By using our website, you are agreeing to the use of Cookies. You can change your settings at any time. Cookie Policy.

Why we need "suits" in IT
There is a reason that the 'suits' and not the scientists have always run IBM. Letting scientists run things is bad for users and investors. It's not just an information technology (IT) phenomenon although DEC, Data General, and Wang are examples. Their founders, the hackers of their day, refused to compromise on legal and marketing issues that eventually doomed their companies. Thomas Edison, the hacker of all hackers, famously refused to compromise his preference for direct-current (DC) electricity distribution in favor of alternating current (AC), reportedly arranging to electrocute many cats, cows, dogs, and horses to prove his point.

There is no need to go back 30 or 120 years for proof. The phenomenon of no compromise among hackers continues between parts of the open source software (OSS) community and Microsoft over client/server (C/S) interoperability. The latest battleground involves the European Union's (EU's) 2004 anti-trust findings against Microsoft, which was upheld on September 17, 2007 by the EU's Court of First Instance (CFI). 'Suits' simply would not have let this side show go on this long.



(Note: I use the term "side show" because the EU investigation and court case discussed here has other aspects, most notably the bundling of Window Media Player. This article is only about C/S interoperability.)

In 1998, Sun asked Microsoft for protocol information to allow Solaris servers to work with Windows clients. Microsoft said, "Sure, come to TechEd." That was also Microsoft's initial legal defense two years later after an EU Competition Commission (EU CC) anti-trust investigation began. Sun's request, according to the EU CC, could be summarized as "We want a Solaris server to interact with Windows clients in a workgroup exactly the same way a Windows server does." It boils down to interfacing the server message block (SMB). As a result there have been $10s of millions in attorney fees and EU bureaucrat time spent on NetBIOSs and NetBEUIs, named pipes, inter-process communications, remote procedure calls, sockets and a lot of other artefacts out of the mists of the beginnings of IT.

In April 2004 the EU CC ruled that Microsoft had to provide "complete and accurate interface information which would allow rival vendors to interoperate with Windows, and to make that information available on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms." This was pretty bland stuff, nothing like the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) forcing IBM to unbundle in the 1970s. 'Suits' would most likely not even have appealed. But Microsoft did. Even if the suits had appealed, they certainly would have settled up when Microsoft couldn't get an EU court to issue a stay on the EU CC ruling. Without a stay, Microsoft had to begin implementing what it calls the Workgroup Server Protocol Program (WSPP) even as appeals continued. Any 'suit' would have realized that it would be expensive and a burden on users to reverse course once the WSPP began.

-1-

1  2  3  4  5  

   Next Page

Explore Our Topics

  • EDITOR'S BRIEFING
  • Virtual Conferences
  • Webinars
  • Roundtables

BPM in Action

March 10, 2011

The sixth annual BPM in Action 2011 Virtual Conference will explore cutting-edge market developments in BPM and describe how to leverage them for improved business operation and performance. More

View All Virtual Conferences

Smart Case Management: Why It's So Smart.

Date:Nov 05, 2009
Time:12:00 PM ET- (17:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!

Date:Oct 29, 2009
Time:15:00 PM ET- (19:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
View All Roundtables
  • Research Library
  • Podcasts
  • News

Joe McKendrick: Part II of II: Designing Evolve-ability into SOA and IT Systems

In part two of Joe McKendrick's recent podcast with Miko Matsumura, chief strategist for Software AG, they talk about how SOA and IT systems need to change and grow and adapt with the organization around it.

Listen Now

Phil Wainewright: Helping Brands Engage with Social Media

Phil Wainewright interviews David Vap, VP of products at RightNow Technologies, and finds out how sharing best practices can help businesses understand how best to engage with online communities.

Listen Now

Peter Schooff: Making Every IT Dollar Result in a Desired Business Outcome: Scott Hebner of IBM Rati

Scott Hebner, Vice President of Marketing and Strategy for IBM Rational, discusses a topic on the top of every company's mind today: getting the most from IT investments.

Listen Now

Jessica Ann Mola: Where Will BI Fit In? Lyndsay Wise Explains

In BI, this tough economy and the increasing role of Web 2.0 and MDM are certainly topics on people's minds today. WiseAnalytics' Lyndsay Wise addresses each of them in this informative podcast.

Listen Now

Dennis Byron: Talking with...Deepak Singh of BPM Provider Adeptia

Deepak Singh, President and CTO of Adeptia, joins ebizQ's Dennis Byron in a podcast that gets its hand around the trend of industry-specific BPM.

Listen Now
More Podcasts
  • Most Popular
  • Quick Guide
  • Most Discussed

Quick Guide: What is BPM?

Learn More

Quick Guide: What is Event Processing?

Smart event processing can help your company run smarter and faster. This comprehensive guide helps you research the basics of complex event processing (CEP) and learn how to get started on the right foot with your CEP project using EDA, RFID, SOA, SCADA and other relevant technologies. Learn More

Quick Guide: What is Enterprise 2.0?

A lot of people are talking about Enterprise 2.0 as being the business application of Web 2.0 technology. However, there's still some debate on exactly what this technology entails, how it applies to today's business models, and which components bring true value. Some use the term Enterprise 2.0 exclusively to describe the use of social networking technologies in the enterprise, while others use it to describe a web economy platform, or the technological framework behind such a platform. Still others say that Enterprise 2.0 is all of these things. Learn More