July 09, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
Management Best Practices Syndicate This
Print this article    Email this article    Talk Back!    Write to Editor
Software IP Indemnification—Do You Need a Plan?
01/24/2005
By David A. Kelly, Analyst, ebizQ

Be prepared. It’s always good idea, especially when it comes to reducing risk and the potential risk associated with intellectual property embodied software that your organization is using.

ADVERTISEMENT
Our Popular Webinars
BPM for Financial Services
Roundtable Discussion: Open Source Market Update
Evolving Security Architectures and SOA for Better Business Collaboration
Getting Started with BPM
Roundtable Discussion: MDM's Role as a Critical Enabler for SOA
More Webinars

So what’s the issue? How likely are you to be sued for intellectual property infringement based on software that you’ve downloaded, used, or deployed? As we discussed in the last column, software property rights are typically made up of four things: copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. Organizations that infringe on any of those (or are merely suspected of infringing on any of them) can be the target of a lawsuit, the implications of which can range from wasting boatloads of time, money, and corporate resources in defense of such a lawsuit to paying damages to having to remove the offending software (and thus find a suitable replacement without disrupting your business).

On one side is Microsoft, with a revised software license program that covers all four of these software intellectual property issues for almost all the software that Microsoft sells (with the exception of some embedded software). The updated licensing that Microsoft introduced last year covers basically customers—with no cap—for lawsuits arising from intellectual property (IP) infringement cases. It’s some of the best—if not the best—coverage for IP infringement offered in the software industry.

On the other side are Open Source advocates and other software vendors (including large ones like IBM) that provide little, if any, coverage for IP infringement. The rational from this side seems to be that in reality, extremely few companies will truly every face a legal action based on IP infringement and that such coverage or indemnification is, if not meaningless, at least unwarranted. Of course, IBM’s stance is wrapped up in its defense against SCO’s IP-related Linux lawsuit.

From the risk protection perspective, it matters little if an organization is using software they purchased from a software vendor or not when it comes to these types of lawsuits—anyone can be sued (although not necessarily successfully) if infringement (or other legal transgressions) can be claimed. Traditional software vendors protect against this by conscientiously managing the IP that goes into any software product—protecting patents, managing copyrights, and making sure to do due diligence when incorporating outside software or IP into a software product.

Unfortunately, open source software and even open source products from commercial vendors complicates the issue. Even with well-managed open source distributions, organizations can not be absolutely sure of that all the IP and work that has gone into them as not stolen or infringed on existing software, patents, copyrights, etc. Essentially, when you’re buying or using Linux or some other open source project, you’re using it “as is” and assuming the complete risks and responsibilities for defending yourself if the software is found to be infringing.

Page 1

More Top Stories
Is SOA Management Primed for More Consolidation? Gold Club Protected
Expect the Unexpected with Data Security Gold Club Protected
Is BPM the New ERP Software? Gold Club Protected
Podcast - Partnering and Integration in Open Source Software Gold Club Protected
Is Governance the Silver Bullet of Agility? Gold Club Protected
Doing Risk Management Right Gold Club Protected
More Top Stories
Related News
Pringo Adds Micro-Blogging to Social Networking Solutions
Talisma Partners with Denodo for Enterprise Data Mashups
Innotas and Boomi Partner to Bring On-Demand Integration to the Project Portfolio Management Market
More News
Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
ebizQ Web 2.0 and the Enterprise
Your E-mail Address:
Changing Tires on a Moving Car
Case studies and solutions for governing the continuous evolution of complex SOA systems

Date: Jul 15, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(16:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
Roundtable Discussion: MDM's Role as a Critical Enabler for SOA
Date: Jul 16, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(16:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars
  SOA - Look Before You Leap
Because of SOA's enticing benefits, many organizations are tempted to jump into this enormous undertaking before fully considering the implications...Learn More
ebizQ also recommends
 Optimal Service-Parts Management: Part One
 The Geek Gap: Do Suits Care?
 Collaboration and Social Media <i>Taking Stock of Today's Experiences and Tomorrow's Opportunities</i>
 BPM Done Right
 Mitigate Risk with Security Assessments
More White Papers

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map

Live Chat