We use cookies and other similar technologies (Cookies) to enhance your experience and to provide you with relevant content and ads. By using our website, you are agreeing to the use of Cookies. You can change your settings at any time. Cookie Policy.

Every enterprise wants to save money while boosting the bottom line, but dollars don’t always tell the whole story, particularly in decision management initiatives.

Instead, organizations should measure success using a full set of other metrics and factors, experts say. “The key to effective decision management projects is the tie between the decisions being automated and the metrics used by the business to track success,” says James Taylor, CEO of Decision Management Solutions, a Palo Alto, Calif., consulting firm.

When front-line employees such as store clerks and call-center representatives are making decisions, executives need to be able to describe how the decision management system is impacting business objectives, Taylor says. “Once executives see that they need to manage these front-line operational decisions to improve the metrics that measure their own performance, they become much more interested in how systems can be used to do that,” he says.

“In general, it’s not helpful to focus solely on development cost savings or staffing reductions. Focus on business value first and foremost,” Taylor says. He advised companies to view business effectiveness metrics, such as customer profitability, competitive wins and total fraud losses as benchmarks. “These focus on the quality of decisions—better decisions improve business results—and that’s where decision management really shines,” he says.

Companies have an array of metrics to choose from, including purely financial metrics and factors such as ease of implementation and competitive advantage, says Richard Spoon, CEO and founder of ArchPoint Consulting, based in Lafayette, La.

Companies should examine a range of criteria and then weigh which are most important, Spoon says. “You can take 100 points and spread them across equally, or you can spread them out where financial return gets 50 points, or you can do some blend in between,” he says.

What to measure all depends on the company’s objectives, Spoon says. A company focused on rapid expansion may emphasize speed of decisions, ease of implementation and the financial returns associated with decision management. Meanwhile, a company that’s more interested in slower growth and penetrating specific markets may focus less on speed and immediate financial payback.

“So much is about what the company wants to do. There isn’t any metric that’s wholly off the table,” Spoon says.

In terms of metrics for decision management, “I ignore anything that’s about saving time or saving cost,” says Neil Raden, CEO and principal analyst at Hired Brains Inc., a consultancy in Santa Fe, N.M. That’s because when companies save money in one area, the cost typically gets absorbed somewhere else, he says. And saving time doesn’t always correlate to increased productivity.

The bottom line: If the enterprise can show consistency in decision making and that customers and partners are judging the enterprise based on recent interactions, that goes a long way to proving effectiveness, Raden says.

Spoon cautioned against implementing decision-making software strictly for growth purposes. “I would be cautious if I were a company looking at a software package to grow my business,” Raden says.

Automated decisions don’t result in growth; they result in productivity. “What automated decision making will give me is tighter parameters, more feedback into the parameters and a tighter set of choices. But choices still have to be made that are going to grow the company,” Raden says.

“Our experience has been that regardless of how precise the automated decision tool is, you still have to deal with human dynamics—people around the table making decisions and people still fighting for pet projects,” Spoon adds.

For example, the sales team will want to measure customer-centric metrics, manufacturing will want to examine equipment and human resources will focus on staffing. Automated decision software processes are going to tell you which of those is the most important relative to company’s criteria, Spoon says, adding that the team will still have to commit to investing in what is most important at that time.

The experts concur that focusing on one metric as the holy grail for measuring decision management software is a counterproductive approach. Instead, enterprises are best served by viewing several metrics that align with their objectives and evaluating from there. Or as Spoon puts it: “There’s no silver bullet in this decision-making exercise. Even if I automate it, it’s still hard to do.”

READER FEEDBACK: How does your company measure the success of its decision management initiative? ebizQ editors would like to hear about your experience. Contact Site Editor Anne Stuart at astuart@techtarget.com.

About the Author

Christine Parizo is a freelance writer specializing in business and technology. She's based in West Springfield, Mass. Contact her at christine@christineparizo.com.

More by Christine Parizo, ebizQ Contributor



Explore Our Topics

  • Virtual Conferences
  • Webinars
  • Roundtables

BPM in Action

March 10, 2011

The sixth annual BPM in Action 2011 Virtual Conference will explore cutting-edge market developments in BPM and describe how to leverage them for improved business operation and performance. More

View All Virtual Conferences

Smart Case Management: Why It's So Smart.

Date:Nov 05, 2009
Time:12:00 PM ET- (17:00 GMT)


Date:Oct 29, 2009
Time:15:00 PM ET- (19:00 GMT)

View All Roundtables
  • Research Library
  • Podcasts
  • News

Joe McKendrick: Part II of II: Designing Evolve-ability into SOA and IT Systems

In part two of Joe McKendrick's recent podcast with Miko Matsumura, chief strategist for Software AG, they talk about how SOA and IT systems need to change and grow and adapt with the organization around it.

Listen Now

Phil Wainewright: Helping Brands Engage with Social Media

Phil Wainewright interviews David Vap, VP of products at RightNow Technologies, and finds out how sharing best practices can help businesses understand how best to engage with online communities.

Listen Now

Peter Schooff: Making Every IT Dollar Result in a Desired Business Outcome: Scott Hebner of IBM Rati

Scott Hebner, Vice President of Marketing and Strategy for IBM Rational, discusses a topic on the top of every company's mind today: getting the most from IT investments.

Listen Now

Jessica Ann Mola: Where Will BI Fit In? Lyndsay Wise Explains

In BI, this tough economy and the increasing role of Web 2.0 and MDM are certainly topics on people's minds today. WiseAnalytics' Lyndsay Wise addresses each of them in this informative podcast.

Listen Now

Dennis Byron: Talking with...Deepak Singh of BPM Provider Adeptia

Deepak Singh, President and CTO of Adeptia, joins ebizQ's Dennis Byron in a podcast that gets its hand around the trend of industry-specific BPM.

Listen Now
More Podcasts
  • Most Popular
  • Quick Guide
  • Most Discussed

Quick Guide: What is BPM?

Learn More

Quick Guide: What is Event Processing?

Smart event processing can help your company run smarter and faster. This comprehensive guide helps you research the basics of complex event processing (CEP) and learn how to get started on the right foot with your CEP project using EDA, RFID, SOA, SCADA and other relevant technologies. Learn More

Quick Guide: What is Enterprise 2.0?

A lot of people are talking about Enterprise 2.0 as being the business application of Web 2.0 technology. However, there's still some debate on exactly what this technology entails, how it applies to today's business models, and which components bring true value. Some use the term Enterprise 2.0 exclusively to describe the use of social networking technologies in the enterprise, while others use it to describe a web economy platform, or the technological framework behind such a platform. Still others say that Enterprise 2.0 is all of these things. Learn More