At first glance, Citrixs
$500 million offer for hypervisor provider XenSource fills an obvious gap
in Citrixs desktop virtualization product line: while Citrix built its business
offering a terminal server deployment path for Windows (and other OSs), XenSource
competes the picture by providing a way to virtualize the client side as well.
It also nicely steals the headlines a day after VMwares partial IPO.
But the real buzz is not so much about the deal itself, but what happens with
Microsoft, which happens to be the silent 16-ton gorilla sitting in the back
of the room. Citrix has had a technology-sharing arrangement with Microsoft
for roughly a decade, while XenSource has enjoyed access to Microsofts
budding Viridian technology (which will form the core of its own upcoming Windows
hypervisor itself) as part of Microsofts policy to support interoperability
with Linux environments. Yet, when Microsoft actually productizes its next generation
Windows hypervisor, code-named Viridian, as part of Windows Server 2008, that
would be in direct competition with the Xen technology.
As my colleague Dana Gardner summed it up, The move further cements an
already strong relation with Microsoft on the part of Citrix, but complicates
the picture when it comes to open source. That is, XenSources technology
being open source, it doesnt own it. Or as industry analyst Brian Madden
asked, What exactly did they just pay $500M for? Well be talking
about this tomorrow as we record the next BriefingsDirect
podcast.
Well take the safe route on this one. Citrix had a hole in its desktop
virtualization offerings, and as the best-known emerging rival to VMware, XenSource
was the ripest fruit for the picking. Nonetheless, as Citrix is not an open
source company, wed concur with 451 Group analyst Rachel Chalmers, as
quoted by eWeeks Peter Galli today that in all likelihood, the combined
Citrix/Xen would likely spin out the Xen project into a nonprofit open source
foundation, a la Eclipse. In essence, Citrix would be buying a company using
the Red Hat subscription model.
Our take is that the deal wont necessarily shake the cooptition that
Microsoft and Citrix have engaged in for years. If you recall, Citrix provided
the first Windows terminal server as part of a technology sharing deal with
Microsoft, then Microsoft chimed in with its own, followed by Citrixs
fancy footing to extend its terminal server across multiple OSs. When Microsoft
finally unleashes Viridian as part of Windows Server 2008, its need for Linux
interoperability wont go away.
About the Author
Tony Baer is a well-published IT analyst with over 15 years background in enterprise systems and manufacturing. A frequent speaker at IT conferences, Baer focuses on strategic technology utilization for the enterprise. Baer studies implementation issues in distributed data management, application development, data warehousing, and leading enterprise application areas including ERP, supply chain planning, and customer relationship management. As co-author of several books covering J2EE and .NET technologies, Baer is an authority on emerging platforms. Previously chief analyst for Computerwire’s Computer Finance, Baer is a leading authority on IT economics and cost of ownership issues.
onStrategies is a services group that provides market analysis on the software industry and insights on the impact of strategic technologies on the enterprise.
Formerly known as Demand Strategies, we help technology vendors sharpen their message through better understanding of current market directions and critical implementation issues with their customers. We help market analyst firms extend their coverage through custom reports. And we help technology users by studying best practices in project implementation to deliver positive ROI.
View the company Web site at www.onstrategies.com