Breaking up the dog days of summer, IBM announced its intention to acquire Princeton
Softech, a firm best known for its database archiving tools. Aside from the obvious
market synergy IBMs databases and customers are a majority of Princetons
installed base Princeton brings an interesting mixed bag of capabilities
that fit well with IBMs emerging data governance initiatives.
In one sense, the issues that Princeton addresses are age old, which is that
you dont want archival data clogging up your most expensive storage arrays.
But IBM is not buying just your fathers information lifecycle management
(ILM itself a modernized take on hierarchical storage management) tool.
Its buying a supplier whose tools infuse meaning into data thats
being offloaded and provide a policy engine for determining where and how to
store it. And because it can superimpose a business subject view that to us
borders on providing a form of semantic data access (that is, you can associate
data by logic, as opposed to strict entity relationships), it makes the archives
far more accessible.
According to Princeton Softech Chairman and CEO Paul Winn, those capabilities
have proven trump cards to sales over the past twelve to fifiteen months. Whereas
the largest chunk of its business used to be ILM-driven (e.g., find the least
expensive place to store data based on currency or other factors), compliance-related
factors are accounting for much of the growth. Specifically, if you are investigating
a financial transaction or documenting compliance with privacy protection laws,
having metadata or business objects to guide you through the archive can prove
valuable forensic aids.
In the long run there could be synergy with IBMs Information Server,
providing a semantic overlay that covers live and archived data. Looking for
data by its meaning rather than its description in the long run may provide
a more structured alternative to enterprise search technology. IBM agrees that
its on the table, but we get the feeling that at this point
semantic integration is not the first thing on their to-do list.
Princeton also brings assets such as test data management (not that unique)
and data archive and migration tools for major enterprise applications (primarily
Oracle so far, but eventually SAP and Microsoft). The combination will readily
complement IBM Softwares Data Management groups Master Data Management
and Information Server offerings, and IBM Tivoli access control and security
solutions. As an IBM acquisition, Princeton Softech may not carry the scope
of Ascential, but its an equally logical fit.
About the Author
Tony Baer is a well-published IT analyst with over 15 years background in enterprise systems and manufacturing. A frequent speaker at IT conferences, Baer focuses on strategic technology utilization for the enterprise. Baer studies implementation issues in distributed data management, application development, data warehousing, and leading enterprise application areas including ERP, supply chain planning, and customer relationship management. As co-author of several books covering J2EE and .NET technologies, Baer is an authority on emerging platforms. Previously chief analyst for Computerwire’s Computer Finance, Baer is a leading authority on IT economics and cost of ownership issues.
onStrategies is a services group that provides market analysis on the software industry and insights on the impact of strategic technologies on the enterprise.
Formerly known as Demand Strategies, we help technology vendors sharpen their message through better understanding of current market directions and critical implementation issues with their customers. We help market analyst firms extend their coverage through custom reports. And we help technology users by studying best practices in project implementation to deliver positive ROI.
View the company Web site at www.onstrategies.com
Eighty percent of publicized data breaches come from internal sources, and this suggests that organizations that have focused their IT security...Learn More