SOA in Action Blog

Joe McKendrick

Will EDA Solve the Issues of Externalized SOA?

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

By now, we're familiar with the promises of loose coupling and flexibility SOA is intended to bring to corporate systems. Now, the move is on to extend SOA beyond the firewall and enable business partners or outsourcers to access and share services.

In a new article, Jack van Hoof explains that when a company outsources parts of its processes (and who doesn't these days), standard SOA may nt be appropriate. Instead, the way to go may be Event-Driven Architecture, or EDA.

The "synchronous command-and-control nature of SOA is a way of tightly coupling application components which doesn’t allow for this kind of flexibility," he explained. "SOA may be loosely coupled in the technical domain, where common Web services technology is used, but it certainly is not in the functional domain where SOA is associated with ‘calling’ foreign (reusable) services and eliminating data redundancy."

The problem with SOA, he says, is "the availability of services and stored data can be vanished after an act of outsourcing, which may lead to costly consequences and high risks. This has all to do with creating dependencies with SOA. The promise of SOA delivering loose coupling, which typically is asynchronous, could at the functional level be stated as a false promise."

EDA helps "achieve loose coupling and autonomy" in these multi-enterprise settings, van Hoof writes. "In contrast to SOA, EDA provides a way of loose coupling. EDA is not a synchronous command-and-control type of pattern, but just the contrary: an asynchronous publish-and-subscribe type of pattern. The publisher is completely unaware of the subscriber and vice versa; components are loosely coupled in the sense that they only share the semantics of the message."

"If you are seeking to support strong cohesion in the business processes, situations where all process steps are under one control, SOA is the way to go," said van Hoof. "If you are seeking to support independency between business process steps, EDA is the way to go."

Since SOA (as we know it today) first came on the scene five years ago, the emphasis has been on employing it as a methodology for integration of disparate enterprise applications. Now, companies are looking to establish clusters of SOAs that extend beyond their enterprises to those of operational partners. This means SOA should no longer be treated as just another IT network.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.ebizq.net/MT4/mt-tb.cgi/11778

Leave a comment

SOA in Action Blog

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. View more

Subscribe



Subscribe in Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add ebizQ's SOA in Action Blog to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Add to Google

Recently Commented On

Tag Cloud

Accenture, Active Endpoints, AlignSpace, Amazon Web Services, amazon web services, AmberPoint, Anne Thomas Manes, Apache, Apache Project, Association for Enterprise Information, automated decision making, Bank of America, Brenda Michelson, business activity monitoring, Business agility, business process management, California Institute of Technology, Capability Maturity Model Integration, Carnegie-Mellon Software Engineering Institute, chief information officer, Citigroup, Cloud Summit, COBOL, complex event processing, Data Direct, data integration, data management, Dave Linthicum, dave linthicum, David Bressler, David Linthicum, Dion Hinchcliffe, E-Gov, economy, ed horst, Ed Horst, electronic health records, enterprise application integration, enterprise architecture, enterprise decision management, enterprise information integration, enterprise mashups, Enterprise Service Bus, ERP, European Union, federal government, Fiorano, Forrester, Forrester Research, Frank Kenney, FUSE, Gartner, grid computing, Hibernate, hurwitz, IBM, IEEE, Informatica, Information Builders, InterSystems, Intuit, iPhone, iTKO, J2EE, Java EE, JBOWS, Jessica Mola, Joe McKendrick, John Crupi, john favazza, John Reimer, JP Morgenthal, Judith Hurwitz, Keane, Kelly Emo, Key Agility Indicators, Layer 7, legacy modernization modernization, mainframe, mashups, michael kavis, Michael Poulin, mike hammer, miko matsumura, Miko Matsumura, OASIS, Object Management Group, OMG, Oracle, Oracle Fusion Middleware, Peter Schooff, Phil Wainewright, Progress Apama, Progress Software, Progress Software Ed Horst, Randy Heffner, RedMonk, Regev Yativ, REST, SAP, Security Token Service, Service Component Architecture, ServiceMix, soa, SOA, SOA Consortium, soa for dummies, soa governance, SOA governance, SOA in Action, soa in action conference, SOA in Action conference, SOA Manifesto, soa patterns, soa predictions, SOA Software, SOA Symposium, SOAP, social BPM, software ag, Software AG, software as a service, Soumadeep Sen, Spinal Tap, SpringSource, SUPER, supply chain management, System z, Tarak Modi, The Open Group, the open group, TIBCO, US Coast Guard, US Department of Defense, US Navy, WebLayers, WebMethods, Windows, WS-*, WS-Security, WS-Trust, WSO2, Yefim Natis,

Monthly Archives

ADVERTISEMENT