SOA in Action Blog

Joe McKendrick

SOA Need Not be so Scary

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

In anticipation of the upcoming "SOA in Action" virtual conference, October 30-31, ebizQ's own Gian Trotta recently chatted with Randy Heffner of Forrester Research to talk about some of the misconceptions around service-oriented architectures these days. Randy will be keynoting day two of the event (details here).

Since the conference will fall on that certain time of the year when hobgoblins rule, Randy provided Gian some of the "tricks and treats" coming out of SOA efforts these days. (Summary and podcast here.)

Randy's SOA trick or treating advice includes the following:

Keep Web services separate from SOA. Companies still make the mistake of viewing the two concepts as one single endeavor, thus sabotaging their best efforts, Heffner says. “Instead, view SOA as a broad set of design concepts centering on your major business processes and transactions. View Web services as one set of application-to-application communication protocols by which to access your services.”

Think of SOA as more -- far more -- than a technology. “That’s a very small view of SOA,” says Heffner. What’s more important is the idea of SOA as a business design to enable strategic transformation and flexibility to optimize processes, which is the higher level view of SOA.

You don't need to buy anything new to get started with SOA. You don’t necessarily need to buy loads of new products that break the bank in order to do SOA, Heffner says. “While it’s true that you may eventually buy enterprise services buses and SOA management and repositories and appliances and such, you may well be able to get started on SOA and achieve strong business benefits without buying anything new.”

Don't get too caught up with the SOA registry. “The real treat within an SOA registry repository solution is not the registry, but the workflow and the service lifecycle tools around the repository,” Heffner said. That’s what gets you a start on what makes SOA successful — strong governance and organizational maturity to use a repository in the right way.

I will also be leading a session at the event, a panel discussion entitled: “SOA and Web 2.0: Mashups, SaaS, and Collaboration: Putting the Pieces Together.” The premise is that SOA and Web 2.0 share common goals, and there is enormous potential for Web 2.0 to accelerate SOA efforts.

But how do we connect the dots between Web 2.0 and SOA? SOA and SaaS, for example, share common frameworks. Then there’s the enhanced collaboration SOA developers and architects can achieve as a result of Web 2.0 tools. Then there’s the mashup scenario, in which end-users can build their own applications — the ultimate vision of SOA. Finallly, front-end environments such a Ajax and other rich client interfaces may help extend the “last mile” of SOA to the desktop.

So join me at the conference, and along with a panel of distinguished experts (to be announced), we’ll figure out how to put those pieces together.

A full SOA in Action Conference agenda can be found here.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.ebizq.net/MT4/mt-tb.cgi/11626

Leave a comment

SOA in Action Blog

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. View more

Subscribe



Subscribe in Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add ebizQ's SOA in Action Blog to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Add to Google

Recently Commented On

Tag Cloud

Accenture, Active Endpoints, AlignSpace, Amazon Web Services, amazon web services, AmberPoint, Anne Thomas Manes, Apache, Apache Project, Association for Enterprise Information, automated decision making, Bank of America, Brenda Michelson, business activity monitoring, Business agility, business process management, California Institute of Technology, Capability Maturity Model Integration, Carnegie-Mellon Software Engineering Institute, chief information officer, Citigroup, Cloud Summit, COBOL, complex event processing, Data Direct, data integration, data management, Dave Linthicum, dave linthicum, David Bressler, David Linthicum, Dion Hinchcliffe, E-Gov, economy, ed horst, Ed Horst, electronic health records, enterprise application integration, enterprise architecture, enterprise decision management, enterprise information integration, enterprise mashups, Enterprise Service Bus, ERP, European Union, federal government, Fiorano, Forrester, Forrester Research, Frank Kenney, FUSE, Gartner, grid computing, Hibernate, hurwitz, IBM, IEEE, Informatica, Information Builders, InterSystems, Intuit, iPhone, iTKO, J2EE, Java EE, JBOWS, Jessica Mola, Joe McKendrick, John Crupi, john favazza, John Reimer, JP Morgenthal, Judith Hurwitz, Keane, Kelly Emo, Key Agility Indicators, Layer 7, legacy modernization modernization, mainframe, mashups, michael kavis, Michael Poulin, mike hammer, miko matsumura, Miko Matsumura, OASIS, Object Management Group, OMG, Oracle, Oracle Fusion Middleware, Peter Schooff, Phil Wainewright, Progress Apama, Progress Software, Progress Software Ed Horst, Randy Heffner, RedMonk, Regev Yativ, REST, SAP, Security Token Service, Service Component Architecture, ServiceMix, soa, SOA, SOA Consortium, soa for dummies, soa governance, SOA governance, SOA in Action, soa in action conference, SOA in Action conference, SOA Manifesto, soa patterns, soa predictions, SOA Software, SOA Symposium, SOAP, social BPM, software ag, Software AG, software as a service, Soumadeep Sen, Spinal Tap, SpringSource, SUPER, supply chain management, System z, Tarak Modi, The Open Group, the open group, TIBCO, US Coast Guard, US Department of Defense, US Navy, WebLayers, WebMethods, Windows, WS-*, WS-Security, WS-Trust, WSO2, Yefim Natis,

Monthly Archives

ADVERTISEMENT