February 10, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
Andre Yee
Andre Yee's Security Insider
An open dialogue about security and compliance for the enterprise.

« Dueling Malware | Main | MySpace Worm on the Loose »

November 07, 2006
Potential Problems with e-Voting

Even as you're out participating in the democratic process today, you should probably know that many security experts have been sounding concern about the use of e-voting. In particular, they are concerned about the trustworthiness of the e-voting system. Recently, these experts have called on the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to review and revise the e-voting security guidelines and processes.

In response, Paul DeGregorio, chairman of the EAC has opined that the concerns voiced by security experts are actually hurting the electoral process rather than helping it. He says

"Is there any proof that a voting system has successfully been hacked during an election? No... Can the hype over hacking discourage voters from participating in our elections? It certainly can."

Mr. DeGregorio may be right but there are others who are concerned about protecting the integrity of e-voting before any compromise or tampering occurs.

A Princeton paper released a couple of months ago highlighted that the Diebold e-voting machines were assessed to be vulnerable to malware and voter fraud. This has led to widespread concern about the overall security and robustness of the e-voting machines.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation argues convincingly for a paper trail in order to maintain auditability and provide confirmation to the voter that the votes were registered as intended. On their website, the EFF makes the following case -

"Twenty-three states still do not require a paper record of all votes, despite the demonstrated technical failures of e-voting machines in the 2004 presidential election -- including the complete loss of thousands of votes. In turn, voters cannot verify that the e-voting machines are recording their votes as intended, and election officials cannot conduct recounts."

To not federally mandate a paper trail befuddles me...seems like a simple enough solution with important ramifications. It's amazing that we can get paper verification on how much gas we've purchased but not on who we've voted for.

Posted by andreyee in Odds and Ends |Digg This|Add to del.icio.us

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ebizq.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/934

Comments Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

We ask that you type your code (displayed below) in the text box.This code is an image that cannot be read by a machine. It prevents automated programs from submitting comments.


Code:



Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT
RSS Subscription

Blog Roll
This Work
Accountability:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ

Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
Your E-mail Address:
BAM: The Killer App for CEP
Date: Feb 12, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Event Processing Market Pulse
Date: Feb 14, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map