October 13, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
Dennis Byron
Open Source Software Up the Stack
Dennis Byron’s blog on open source software: A longtime market research analyst follows what “the movement” means to business integration—in applications, infrastructure, as services, as architecture and as functionality.

« Need to Keep Up with OSS Developments: We Give Them to You Straight, Not Spun | Main | What's Open Source Got to Do with SaaS? »

July 10, 2007
Microsoft/GPL Debate: It's all about the coupons, not the code

If this is Tuesday, it must be time to write a Microsoft-GPL blog post. This debate is always a sure thing subject during the dog days of summer when nothing else of interest is happening.

Last week, Microsoft put out a statement in response to the Friday June 29 release of the GNU General Public License version 3 (GPL v3). In what must be the understatement of the still young 21st century, it began: "Microsoft is not a party to the GPLv3 license …" Why would anyone think it was? The open source software (OSS) community itself—including many users of GPL v2 (not to mention users of Apache, Mozilla, Berkeley, etc. OSS licenses)—still seems pretty divided over the new GPL license wording so until the OSS world gets its act together, why care what Microsoft thinks?

Maybe Microsoft is just feeding the fire among the left and right wings of the OSS community, a little summertime sport? Apparently the Free Software Foundation (FSF) or allied organizations are now claiming that the GPL v3 wording applies retroactively to the Novell-Microsoft November 2006 agreement. This was the arrangement that included Microsoft giving out Novell SUSE Linux "coupons" thereby in some opinions becoming "distributors" of GPL v2-licensed Linux. Earlier the FSF founder was quoted (or interpreted) as saying that GPL v3 did not apply to the coupon caper. He said that the FSF would make changes to GPL v3 to make sure others could not do what Novell and Microsoft had done with GPL-licensed code but that the horse was out of the barn for last year's agreement.

Mary Jo Foley asks the question this way at her blog: "Is Microsoft legal holding a trump card that no one knows about? The answer is probably yes. Microsoft is really saying "we are not distributing no-stinking Linux, we're distributing coupons." Read the Microsoft statement again and you see that it is all about the certificates. After the opening understatement, the subject of the second, third and fifth sentences are the coupons. (The fourth and final sentences remind everyone that Microsoft has some patents in this area just in case anyone would like to contest them.)


Tags:

Posted by dennisb in OSS Culture |Digg This|Add to del.icio.us

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ebizq.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2111

Comments Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

We ask that you type your code (displayed below) in the text box.This code is an image that cannot be read by a machine. It prevents automated programs from submitting comments.


Code:



Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to this blog’s feed
My Work Elsewhere
Blog Roll
This Work
Accountability:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ

Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
ebizQ Web 2.0 and the Enterprise
Your E-mail Address:
Enterprise Service Bus: The case for 'e'SBs
Date: Oct 16, 2008
Time: 14:00 PM ET
(18:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
BPM for Insurance: Are You Staying Competitive?
Date: Oct 28, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(16:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map

Live Chat