February 10, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
Peter Schooff
Peter Twenty-Four Seven Security
Peter Schooff's blog is a daily look at what's going on in the world of computer security with an emphasis on how it affects businesses.

« Who Is Going to Secure Virtualization? | Main | Podcast with Configuresoft: The Security Pluses and Pitfalls of Virtualization »

October 03, 2007
Should Companies Ban Web 2.0?

There's an interesting interoffice point/counter-point going on over at the Intel bulletin boards over whether Intel should ban the use of Facebook, Twitter, Plaxo, Fileshare, and other Web 2.0 tools/time-wasters. While each tool does something quite different (and Plaxo and Fileshare have been banned by Intel, as they are address book and filesharing programs, and clearly pose a threat), each tool opens the company up to new and unknown vulnerabilities.

While it may be easy and expeditious for Intel to simply ban Web 2.0 outright with the argument that any employee using those tools isn’t being productive anyway, I think the argument is much more complex than that (and while writing the blog, Josh Bancroft observed that 3,500 Intel employees were currently on the Intel Facebook network).

The blogger actively uses both Facebook and Twitter at work, saying that if Intel was to make the argument that employees should only engage in work while at work, then Bancroft could rightly refuse to do any work during his off hours -- but with early morning and late night conference calls to all corners of the world, that’s an impossibility.

Then there’s the idea that people using Web 2.0 tools might actually be doing work, where, in the case of sales, or networking, or keeping an eye on competitors, those tools are absolutely essential. Also, there’s the idea that if an employee is determined to break the rules, or actually harm or steal data from their company, no amount of "corporate policy" is going to stop them, and is exactly why a company needs strict access controls and good database security to stop the rogue employee.

If you haven’t guessed already, I am one for openness, and while companies should definitely do a threat assessment and shut down the most obvious Web 2.0 threats, as well as protect their data assets, but otherwise, just like information wants to be free, so do employees.

Posted by pschooff in |Digg This|Add to del.icio.us

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ebizq.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2374

Comments Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

We ask that you type your code (displayed below) in the text box.This code is an image that cannot be read by a machine. It prevents automated programs from submitting comments.


Code:



Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe
News Feed
Blog Roll
Blogosphere
This Work
Accountability:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ

Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
Your E-mail Address:
BAM: The Killer App for CEP
Date: Feb 12, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Event Processing Market Pulse
Date: Feb 14, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map