October 12, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
Peter Schooff
Peter Twenty-Four Seven Security
Peter Schooff's blog is a daily look at what's going on in the world of computer security with an emphasis on how it affects businesses.

« Microsoft Issues 7 Critical Patches | Main | Storm Worm Raging Again »

July 12, 2007
When CEOs Spam

The Wall Street Journal reported that the chief executive of Whole Foods Market Inc. , John Mackey, wrote anonymous online attacks against one of his rivals, Wild Oats Markets. While this might happen more than we care to admit, the reason this might be considered a crime is, at the time, Whole Foods was trying to buy the smaller company, and the CEO was trying to drive to price down.

The CEO posted on Internet financial forums under the anonymous name, “rahodeb,” saying that Wild Oats stock prices were too high, and predicted the company would go into bankruptcy and its stock would fall below $5 share. Last February, Whole Foods announced it planned to buy Wild Oats for $18.50 a share, or $565 million.

This was all made public as part of an FCC lawsuit against Whole Foods on antitrust grounds, with the FCC contending that, by combining the two largest natural and organic retailers in the country, it would concentrate too much power and diminish competitiveness.

The company acknowledged that the CEO was responsible for those comments, but said they were taken out of context. "Mr. Mackey made those postings from 1999 to 2006 under an alias to avoid having his comments associated with the company and to avoid others placing too much emphasis on his remarks," Whole Foods said.

One post stated: "Would Whole Foods buy (Wild Oats)? Almost surely not at current prices," rahodeb wrote. "What would they gain? (Their) locations are too small."

The company said that Mackey's opinions "now have far less relevance than when they were written. In addition, like most people, Mr. Mackey's opinion about some things has changed over time." While this isn’t exactly what we mean when we say companies need to protect against insider attacks, Whole Food concluded by saying the comments were Mackey’s, and not those of the company. Isn't that like saying the opinions of this blog are not the responsibility of the author?

Tag: Whole Foods, Whole Foods, Spam,


Tags:

Posted by pschooff in |Digg This|Add to del.icio.us

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ebizq.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2120

Comments Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

We ask that you type your code (displayed below) in the text box.This code is an image that cannot be read by a machine. It prevents automated programs from submitting comments.


Code:



Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe
News Feed
Blog Roll
Blogosphere
This Work
Accountability:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ

Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
ebizQ Web 2.0 and the Enterprise
Your E-mail Address:
Enterprise Service Bus: The case for 'e'SBs
Date: Oct 16, 2008
Time: 14:00 PM ET
(18:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
BPM for Insurance: Are You Staying Competitive?
Date: Oct 28, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(16:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map

Live Chat