February 10, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
David Linthicum
Dave Linthicum's Podcast Channel
Industry expert Dave Linthicum's musings on the integration industry, delivered once a week.

« “Outside - in SOA” ... Are you ready? | Main | New Podcast Up There...Show 21 »

November 25, 2005
Is BPEL Dead?


It’s funny how things work out. When I first looked at BPEL several years ago I pointed out the limitation of the standard when it came to applicability in the process integration area. Indeed, I did so in my last book. It’s really not a process integration standard, but more of a way that Web services can work and play well together, or the notion of orchestration.

However, today we are just finding this out. As more and more end users attempt to create their first instances of SOA-like solutions, the fact that BPEL is not about process integration or workflow, is now well known. Thus, many are wondering if BPEL’s days are numbered, or if the standard will reinvent itself.

So, what’s the delta between BPEL and process integration. Simply put, business process integration is a set of easily defined and centrally managed processes on top of existing sets of processes contained within a set of enterprise applications. Business process integration or business process management is the science and mechanism of managing the movement of data, and the invocation of processes in the correct and proper order to support the management and execution of common processes that exist in and between applications.

The goal is to bring together relevant processes found in an enterprise or trading community to obtain the maximum amount of value, while supporting the flow of information and control logic between these processes. Business process integration offers a mechanism to bind disparate processes together and to create process-to-process solutions that automate tasks once performed manually.

The problem is that BPEL, for the most part, was not built for process integration. Many vendors are attempting to fill in the missing pieces through proprietary extensions, but that’s never smart. Moreover, the standard is going through the reinvention now. But, you have to ask yourself if it’s in time to save the standard…IT forgives no one. I know many end users that are pushing back on BPEL, instead moving to older business process technology, or other standards such as Choreography. BPEL has certainly hit some rough roads.

Posted by davel at 09:02 AM in | Digg This | Add to del.icio.us

Comments

Hello David,

Have you looked at the OASIS ebXML Business Process (ebBP, BPSS) specification? All the articles I read about using BPEL for Rosettanet seem to me to show that BPSS still is much better at expressing the semantics of e-business processes from a neutral business perspective. I'd be interested in your views on this ..

Pim

Posted by: Pim van der Eijk at December 12, 2005 10:51 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?



We ask that you type your code (displayed below) in the text box.This code is an image that cannot be read by a machine. It prevents automated programs from submitting comments.


Code:



Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT
RSS Subscription

Categories
Blog Roll
This Work
Accountability:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ

Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
Your E-mail Address:
BAM: The Killer App for CEP
Date: Feb 12, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Event Processing Market Pulse
Date: Feb 14, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map