Open for Business

Noam Tamarkin

Integration at the customer site

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

Hello to my readers,

In my previous position, we used to discuss the amount of integration that could be imposed on our customers. The idea was that anyone that will buy our software product will need to integrate it because it would be a big organization with many other systems.

The basic concern is valid. No one want to impose too much effort on the customer. That might drive them away.

Far away from the basic idea is the reality. The reality is that big organizations invest in integration because this is their only way to implement Best of Breed products.

So if you have a unique or leading product, do not worry about integration. That will not be an obstacle.

From the other hand, if SAP or Oracle provides a ERP, the customer will always assume that all the other products they provide will integrate seamlessly.

What is your experience? please share.

Noam

Leave a comment

In this blog, Noam Tamarkin provides ideas for improving and better integrating your applications.

Noam Tamarkin

Noam Tamarkin is a senior software consultant, architect and experienced development manager. View more

Recently Commented On

Tag Cloud

adaptation, analytics, appliance, Application, application, architect, assets, Batch run, Best of breed, best practice, Bus, business, CIS, client, Cloud, cloud, coding, Coghead, complex architecture, complex design, compliance, context, CRM, data, DRP, e-book, EDI, effective, efficient, email, engine, engineering, ERP, ESB, Facebook, financial, framework, FTP, future, go-live, Google Wave, governance, HaaS, hacker, IDE, idea, ideal, IDOC, imaginary, improve maintainability, increase maintainability, industry, Inetgration, infrastructure, innovation, insurance, Integration, integration, Introduction, Intuit, IT, Job, Large, large enterprise, layer, Legacy application, legal, liability, Linux, load, machine, maintainability, Manifesto, manufacturing, Marketing, maturity, message, metadata, Microsoft, middleware, migration, Model, mom and pop, MySpace, New technology, Noam Tamarkin, On-Demand, on-premise, open, Operating system, optimization, optimizing, Oracle, organization culture, Out of the Box, outage, owner, PaaS, physical server, process, Protocol, proxy, QuickBooks, Red Hat, reduce, regulation, reliability, request, Resource, response, REST, RFC, risk, risks, ROI, SaaS, sales, Sales, Salesforce, SAP, security, service, Service, service design, service logic, Service provider, Service technology, service terms, services, SLA, small business, SMB, SME, SOA, SOAP, Social network, software, Software, Software as a Service, software cost, standard, Sun, survival, synchronize, TCO, technology, tenant, Thinking inside the box, thinking out of the box, toolkit, Total Cost of Ownership, train, Twitter, users, Users, Virtual, virtual server, Visual Studio, Web Methods, Windows, Within the box, within the Box, workfolw,

Monthly Archives

Blogs

ADVERTISEMENT