Peter Brand: If programs are perceived as a kind of volition utterance, this question may come to mind.
Whose Intention is Executed by the BP-Engine and Who is Executing it?
Add a Reply
Recently Commented On
-
Will case management eclipse BPM in importance this year? (12)
Dave Duggal wrote: Good question to start the New Year... [more]
-
What are your BPM predictions for 2012? (15)
Christopher Taylor wrote: With a new Gartner Quadrant out for... [more]
-
What modeling techniques should be used for capturing case management processes? (5)
Dave Duggal wrote: Hi Peter - Thanks for raising the p... [more]
-
What was the biggest development for the cloud for 2011? (2)
John Michelsen wrote: The biggest development for the clo... [more]
-
How big of a role does BPMN play in today's projects? (18)
Theo Priestley wrote: Depends where you're starting from ... [more]
Tag Cloud
Blogs
- Agilization
- All Things Social
- Anatomy of Agile Enterprise
- Andre Yee's Security Insider
- Anne Stuart’s BPM in Action
- BI in Action
- BPM and the Social Enterprise
- BPM from a Business Point of View
- BPM in the Cloud(s)
- BPM Insights
- BPM: Theory to Practice
- Business Ecology Initiative & Service-Oriented Solution
- Business IT Buzz Blog
- Business Transformation in Action
- Business-Driven Architect
- Cloud Talk
- Column 2
- Data at Your Service
- Dion Hinchcliffe's Next-Generation Enterprises
- ebizQ Mobile CRM Enterprise Integration
- ebizQ's Business Agility Watch
- Enterprise Architecture Matters
- Enterprise Mashups in Action
- First Look
- Governing the Infrastructure.
- Ground-Floor BPM
- Information Architected for Business
- Integration Innovation
- Integration on the Edge: Data Explosion & Next-Gen Integration
- IT as a Catalyst for Optimal Business Outcomes
- IT Directions
- James Taylor's Decision Management
- Kiran Garimella's BPM Blog
- Leadership BPM
- Leveraging Information and Intelligence
- Making Sense of Business Information.
- Manage Tomorrow's Surprises Today
- New Frontiers in Business Intelligence
- Open Source Software Up the Stack
- Pragmatic Software Design
- Process Makes Perfect
- Process POV (Process point of View)
- Putting the ‘M’ back in BPM
- Ronan Bradley's FinanceTech Directions
- SaaS Week
- Security Matters
- SMA's Insurance Transformation, Where Strategy Meets Action
- Smart Systems in Business
- SOA - Integration Industry Pulse
- SOA Visionaries
- Software Infrastructure for Business Value
- Software Test Management and Metrics
- Tech Blog
- Tech for Tomorrow
- Technology Management Insights
- Ted Cuzzillo's BI
- The Architect Insider
- The Connected Web
- The Healthcare Blog
- The Mike Rothman Security Report
- The Performance Principle
- Twenty-Four Seven Security
- Where SOA Meets Cloud
| ADVERTISEMENT |
Contributing Analysts not contributing?
Fictional example
- IT department of large Swiss bank buys BPM-Suite from Oracle
- Pre-Sales people from Oracle instruct IT-people to master BPM-Suite
- IT department starts a BPM-project, gets support from a Board member
- After-Sales people from Oracle assist IT-architects and -developers in analysis modelling, prototyping and implementing a BPMS
- Users are informed, instructed and forced to use the system
So finally users, running the BPM-Suite's BP-Engine, are mainly executing intentions of IT-people from Oracle and the bank. Intentions, which at best have some similarity with wishes of users, steering volition of leaders, demands of customers, etc.
So, Good Bye and don't forget:
A so-called BP-Engine, i.e., a Computer Processor, cannot - by elementary logic - execute what you call, without too much reflection, a 'Business Process'. Nonsense has no future, or so I hope.