Clearly, there's governance issues related to posting, information sharing, etc. when it comes to social media/Web 2.0 sites. But what about IT governance for social media--is it time to think about Web 2.0 IT governance issues?
Add a Reply
Recently Commented On
-
Will case management eclipse BPM in importance this year? (12)
Dave Duggal wrote: Good question to start the New Year... [more]
-
What are your BPM predictions for 2012? (15)
Christopher Taylor wrote: With a new Gartner Quadrant out for... [more]
-
What modeling techniques should be used for capturing case management processes? (5)
Dave Duggal wrote: Hi Peter - Thanks for raising the p... [more]
-
What was the biggest development for the cloud for 2011? (2)
John Michelsen wrote: The biggest development for the clo... [more]
-
How big of a role does BPMN play in today's projects? (18)
Theo Priestley wrote: Depends where you're starting from ... [more]
Tag Cloud
Blogs
- Agilization
- All Things Social
- Anatomy of Agile Enterprise
- Andre Yee's Security Insider
- Anne Stuart’s BPM in Action
- BI in Action
- BPM and the Social Enterprise
- BPM from a Business Point of View
- BPM in the Cloud(s)
- BPM Insights
- BPM: Theory to Practice
- Business Ecology Initiative & Service-Oriented Solution
- Business IT Buzz Blog
- Business Transformation in Action
- Business-Driven Architect
- Cloud Talk
- Column 2
- Data at Your Service
- Dion Hinchcliffe's Next-Generation Enterprises
- ebizQ Mobile CRM Enterprise Integration
- ebizQ's Business Agility Watch
- Enterprise Architecture Matters
- Enterprise Mashups in Action
- First Look
- Governing the Infrastructure.
- Ground-Floor BPM
- Information Architected for Business
- Integration Innovation
- Integration on the Edge: Data Explosion & Next-Gen Integration
- IT as a Catalyst for Optimal Business Outcomes
- IT Directions
- James Taylor's Decision Management
- Kiran Garimella's BPM Blog
- Leadership BPM
- Leveraging Information and Intelligence
- Making Sense of Business Information.
- Manage Tomorrow's Surprises Today
- New Frontiers in Business Intelligence
- Open Source Software Up the Stack
- Pragmatic Software Design
- Process Makes Perfect
- Process POV (Process point of View)
- Putting the ‘M’ back in BPM
- Ronan Bradley's FinanceTech Directions
- SaaS Week
- Security Matters
- SMA's Insurance Transformation, Where Strategy Meets Action
- Smart Systems in Business
- SOA - Integration Industry Pulse
- SOA Visionaries
- Software Infrastructure for Business Value
- Software Test Management and Metrics
- Tech Blog
- Tech for Tomorrow
- Technology Management Insights
- Ted Cuzzillo's BI
- The Architect Insider
- The Connected Web
- The Healthcare Blog
- The Mike Rothman Security Report
- The Performance Principle
- Twenty-Four Seven Security
- Where SOA Meets Cloud
| ADVERTISEMENT |



Oh, I don't know. The words Web 2.0 and governance don't sit well together, do they?
I'm not sure that social media needs IT governance. Yes, there's risks to corporate engagement of social media but till this point, the risks are relatively peripheral and not tied specifically to IT but primarily to content liability.
I also think the nature of the corporate entity comes into play. A publicly traded company may view this in more stringent light than a $20M, venture backed firm.
Would love to hear other perspectives
The trouble with IT governance is that, when it comes to new stuff like Web 2.0 and social media, IT interprets 'governance' to mean 'prevention'.
I'm not sure that IT is capable of the kind of supportive, light-touch governance that a successful social media initiative requires - which is probably why most of them try to slip unnoticed under IT's radar.
Phil--I'm not sure you're right about that. While many IT departments may interpret 'governance' to mean 'prevention', the really smart ones don't. Social media/Web 2.0 are all just different avenues, approaches and processes for communication, feedback and business opportunities. That's why I think the question is valid, and that IT organizations at least need to be thinking about it and prehaps creating a Web 2.0 governance or social media governance strategy.
Also, I think there's at least two issues here--one is the area of governance for particpation in social media--you know, how do we track what employees are participating in and saying; and the second is governance of social media--if an organization is deploying social media or using social media mechanisms for business purposes, who can they be managed and governed effectively?
At first glance "governed social media" seems like an oxymoron. Governance is really about knowledge and control (though prevention plays a role). I think there is a place for governance when talking about Enterprises using social media. As David Kelly points out, the drivers for this would be tracking employee participation and managing social media resources within the enterprise. I doubt there will ever be a need/demand for governance of social media outside of the enterprise. While the enterprise environment should be controlled, the web shouldn't.
Governance may suggest control, but the other side of governance is that it's all about enabling business oversight of services and methodologies, and measuring progress. It's very important, then, that social media and Web 2.0 be part of a business strategy. It doesn't have to be a strictly confined strategy, but a vision and set of guidelines that help the business realize Web 2.0 opportunities. Otherwise, it becomes an exercise in chaotic inconsistency, and the business won't understand what value it's getting out of letting employees "Facebook" or "Twitter." (Then try to clamp down anyway.)
Phil--While IT governance for social media may require a different (i.e., supportive and light) approach, today’s IT organizations (and governance vendors!) should be able to provide Web 2.0-oriented governance solutions that support overall business governance concerns without completely killing social media initiatives.