February 10, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
James Taylor
James Taylor's Decision Management
James is one the leading experts in enterprise decision management, a published author and a principal of Smart (enough) Systems LLC. His blog discusses the use of decision management technologies like predictive analytics and business rules to deliver agility, improve business processes and bring intelligent automation to SOA.

« Decision Management is at the heart of dynamic business applications | Main | Why you SHOULD loosely couple processes and rules »

September 28, 2007
Diamonds, decisions and processes

Keith Swenson over at Go Flow had an interesting post this week - Decisions vs. Business Decisions in a Process. In it he discusses the challenges of decision nodes in BPMN diagrams and makes the great point that:

"In reality, those nodes don’t actually make decisions."

He is, of course, quite right. Those decision nodes are meant to represent something that can be decided by a piece of software in zero time and most business decisions are not like that (something I discussed before in this discussion on diamonds). Keith goes on to use an example of "An applicant with credit ratings below a certain value will not be eligible for loans over a certain magnitude” as suitable for a decision node. I would argue that the business decision here is, in fact, "applicant's credit is not good enough for loan requested", something that is clearly more complex than a decision node is designed to represent. While Keith feels that the “decision” was made when the rule was specified, I would argue that the business decision is going to be made for each transaction as it happens. Keith talks about "the execution of the rule simply branches the process based on that former parameterized decision in a completely mechanized way" but I think this is taking too much of a process-centric view.
The decision node is not really taking a decision, that's true, but the process requires that an actual decision be taken right then and in this example the decision about credit worthiness is, to use Keith's phrase "A real decision is the kind that is not easy to make".
So my point of view is that one should consider business decisions explicitly and then divide them into those we wish to automate and those we wish to refer. Managing the automation of some business decisions, typically high-volume operational ones, is a different but complementary approach to managing the automation of the processes that need those decisions made. Using business rules to act as the foundation, injecting insight into them with analytics, giving business users control of the rules and ensuring they are constantly refined and revisited is established as a way to do this, proven and easy to integrate with a process-centric view of the world.
Keith goes on to make some additional points. He says:
"While rules are very important in relieving us from the tedium of routine case assessments, there will never at time in the future be a point where we can stop adjusting and modifying the rules, and there will always be edge cases for which it will be quicker and more efficient to have a person simply 'decide'”

The fact that the way a decision is made must constantly evolve explains why decision management requires adaptive control to constantly check and refine how a decision is made. And there may well be some decisions that are easier to refer. But decision management technology allows far more of these decisions to be effectively automated - while still allowing the business to control how they are made - than is implied in Keith's discussion. Not all business decisions can and should be taken by people. Take credit card fraud detection. It has to be automated if it is to be done fast enough to matter. Take the decision to display a retention offer on a website - still a business decision, but an operational one taken in such high volume and short timeframes that it too must be automated.
I did like his phrase "Business Decision Activity" for a person making a decision, just like I like decision services for those that are automated. I discussed some of this in a post on BPM in 2007 and beyond (IDC). Finally he has a great quote:
"Good decisions come from experience … and experience comes from bad decisions."

This is, of course, why analytics matter. Bad decisions are recorded in the data in your systems. Using analytic techniques to make predictions from that data is how systems learn from experience.
BTW if you are interested in Blink, I reviewed it here.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by jtaylor in Business Process ManagementDecision TechnologiesSOA |Digg This|Add to del.icio.us

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ebizq.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2361

Comments Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

We ask that you type your code (displayed below) in the text box.This code is an image that cannot be read by a machine. It prevents automated programs from submitting comments.


Code:



Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT
This Work
Accountability:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ

Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
Your E-mail Address:
BAM: The Killer App for CEP
Date: Feb 12, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Event Processing Market Pulse
Date: Feb 14, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map