July 06, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
James Taylor
James Taylor's Decision Management
James is one the leading experts in enterprise decision management, a published author and a principal of Smart (enough) Systems LLC. His blog discusses the use of decision management technologies like predictive analytics and business rules to deliver agility, improve business processes and bring intelligent automation to SOA.

« How to REALLY combine BI and BPM | Main | Extracting UML from Legacy Applications »

March 29, 2007
What characterises a good decision service?

Jon Collins, over at the Technology Garden, had a post today What characterises a service? He recounts gathering a list of requirements for a good service and gives the following list:

  • Value
  • Reusability
  • Meaningfulness
  • Autonomy
  • Independence
  • Contract
  • Uniqueness

This made me wonder again about the additional characteristics a good decision service might exhibit - clearly it should exhibit all these, but what else. In the spirit of the original post then:

  • Consistency - always makes the same decision when presented with the same data
  • Agility - can be rapidly and easily changed, ideally by the business
  • Precision - makes the best decision possible, given the available historical data, trends and other restrictions
  • Demonstrability - makes decisions in a way that can be clearly explained and demonstrated to others
  • Compliance - follows the regulations and policies in force at the time

Any others come to mind?

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by jtaylor in Decision Technologies • SOA |Digg This|Add to del.icio.us

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ebizq.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1632

Comments

Nice. I've read through the descriptions and the comments on decision services, and I don't have a problem with the concept in principle, as long as it doesn't break the rules of ensuring cohesion while minimising coupling between services (Yourdon and Constantine, 1975 ;) ) Otherwise, one might end up with a solution that is architecturally pure, yet runs lke a dog...

With reference to the characteristics, might I refer the good gentleman to my own list, from http://www.itasaservice.com, not to compare but as a cross reference. With this in mind I would perhaps add security, the ability to provision and account for use, and manageability, i.e. the recognition that some intervention will be required (manual or otherwise) to configure and monitor the service.

Phew. I think my list needs updating!

All the best, Jon

Posted by: Jon Collins at March 30, 2007 12:32 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

We ask that you type your code (displayed below) in the text box.This code is an image that cannot be read by a machine. It prevents automated programs from submitting comments.


Code:



Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT
This Work
Accountability:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ

Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
ebizQ Web 2.0 and the Enterprise
Your E-mail Address:
Changing Tires on a Moving Car
Case studies and solutions for governing the continuous evolution of complex SOA systems

Date: Jul 15, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(16:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
Roundtable Discussion: MDM's Role as a Critical Enabler for SOA
Date: Jul 16, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(16:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map

Live Chat