August 21, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
James Taylor
James Taylor's Decision Management
James is one the leading experts in enterprise decision management, a published author and a principal of Smart (enough) Systems LLC. His blog discusses the use of decision management technologies like predictive analytics and business rules to deliver agility, improve business processes and bring intelligent automation to SOA.

« Live from Brainstorm - BPM Suites and SOA | Main | Live from Brainstorm - Integrating Architecture into Development »

September 19, 2006
Live from Brainstorm - Enabling the agile enterprise

I am attending the Brainstorm BPM/SOA/Rules event in Washington DC this week and blogging as I go. I am not sure if the wireless network will allow me to blog "live"but I will at least post them every few hours.

First session was the Master Mind Session: Enabling the Agile Enterprise with a panel of the show speakers. This is always interesting as it brings together the folks who talk about business process, business rules, SOA, enterprise architecture and performance management. Although the topics seem highly related it often amazes me how little overlap there can be.

Anyway, Ken Vollmer starts off by trying to show how the various pieces fit together. The biggest problem with the view he presents is the failure to link SOA with business rules. Personally I think that SOA requires decision services in general, regardless of whether business process management is the objective or not. Brett Champlin went next and discussed how business process management discipline enabled by technology but process-oriented thinking is #1. Interestingly I think that this is true for adopting business rules also- think about the process, think about the decisions the process needs, decide if those decisions should be automated (in parallel with deciding if automating the process is useful or if my existing systems work just fine).

Bill Ulrich gave a nice overview of how rules and processes fit into a Business Architecture and should/do drive the adoption of an SOA IT infrastructure. The need to enable business/IT collaboration is key and a primary objective of business architecture. Tom Dwyer introduced SOA and emphasized its long conceptual history - the need to have more dynamic, more agile infrastructure to allow recombination of software assets.He also discussed the synergies between BPM/rules/process-thinking and so on with SOA and the fact that SOA sits between a bottom-up integration layer and a top-down process-centric decomposition. Tom talked about SOA as a long term objective for companies, not a simple technology adoption project.

Barb talked business rules and used an example of driving rules (as applied to Italian taxis) to illustrate how unwritten rules and local interpretation can make a big difference! She also asserted, and I agree, that the business rules within a process often change more often than anything else in the process. She also outlined KPI's maturity model from level 0 (no idea), through trying to find the rules, through managing and optimizing rules. Alan Ramais discussed organizational performance and the challenges of creating sustainable, high-performance. You must plan for the kind of performance you want, design it and manage it. This applies at the organizational, process, job role and technology levels. To some extent he is emphasizing the "design with the end in mind" approach - design for the performance you want. If you want process agility, design for it. If you want decision agility, design for it and so on.

They were asked where to start and several suggested that understanding your organization and what kind of performance you want is important. Tom tried to show how an overall blueprint for SOA is essential, even if BPM drives the original SOA adoption. Barb's point of view was to make sure someone is thinking about business rules no matter where you start. There was some useful discussion about pulling it all together and about not driving to a complete SOA (as distinct from using some SOA technology) until you have at least started to think about business processes. In general, however, they all said "start with me". Ho hum. These are interesting people as a group but the session seems to lack a scenario that ties them together.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

 

Posted by jtaylor in Business Activity Monitoring • Business Agility • Business Process Management • Business Rules • Event Processing • SOA |Digg This|Add to del.icio.us

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ebizq.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/699

Comments Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

We ask that you type your code (displayed below) in the text box.This code is an image that cannot be read by a machine. It prevents automated programs from submitting comments.


Code:



Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT
This Work
Accountability:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ

Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
ebizQ Web 2.0 and the Enterprise
Your E-mail Address:
BPM for Financial Services
Date: Aug 26, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(16:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
The Future of Application Servers in the Enterprise & IBM WebSphere Application Server V7
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(16:00 GMT)

REGISTER TODAY!
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map

Live Chat