February 10, 2008   Sign In |  About ebizQ |  Contact Us |  Join ebizQ Gold Club
Sandy Kemsley
Column 2
The archive of Sandy Kemsley's blog on business process management, enterprise architecture, business intelligence and technology in business.

« Updates on Squidoo BPM lens | Main | A bit of meat to go with the whine »

April 08, 2006
Customers that I'd like to fire

I've had two "inconsiderate customer" incidents this week; actually, both are customers who I've done quite a bit of work for in the past but have been inactive for some time.

With customer #1, I contracted in as their business and application architect for several months; even though they didn't really get what enterprise architecture is all about, I spent most of a year trying to do some internal education on the necessity for EA to help sort out the legacy linguine that was rampant in their organization, as well as the lack of business-IT alignment. A while after leaving, on April 29th 2005 to be exact, I dropped my key contact there an email about the (then) new report from BPTrends on EA tools, saying the following:

...there's a new report out from BPTrends on enterprise architecture that you can download for free. I gave it a quick review on my business blog, which includes a link to the report. Although the product information in the report is nothing that you can't get from the vendor's sites, the first 25 or so pages are a great overview of enterprise architecture, process modelling and simulation tools that provide good background material if you're ever promoting a related project. I did an earlier post on their report on BPM suites that you might also find interesting.

Usually this type of email at least gets a "thanks", or "hey, it's been a while, let's meet for coffee", but nothing came back from this. No big deal, customer #1 is a busy person. Then on Tuesday of this week, 340 days after my original email, it arrives:

With customer #2, I did the architecture and design of their original BPM system, and they now need some analysis and design assistance to further increase efficiencies (which presumably would more than pay for my engagement there). Their internal IT architect contacted me in November 2005, we chatted on the phone and by email, then he connected me with the project manager. Long pauses in the conversation ensued, punctuated by several emails and voice mails from me to the PM. Responses took as long as six weeks, or never came at all. Finally, they made a request to have me fly to their site this coming week -- the week leading up to Easter, with Friday a holiday here in Canada, and Saturday being when 13 members of my family will be descending on my home for Easter dinner. That, of course, is my problem, so I said yes. Turns out that no one had the funding approved, however, so I received an email two weeks ago saying that the trip was off. I immediately responded with some suggestions on how to restructure the project to reduce the funding issues while still providing value. Their response? Silence, so far.

The thing that frustrates me is that I'm not an unknown salesperson cold-calling these people, I'm a geeky engineer type who worked on site as part of the in-house team with both of these customers for several months and did significant amounts of work that were well-received. Are they just snowed under with the amount of email that they receive, and ignoring all of their business contacts equally, even if they were the one to initiate the conversation? Or, because I'm a contractor/consultant, don't they consider it worth their time to reply to my email (or even open it for almost a year)? At least I'm pretty sure that they're not reading this blog entry...

Posted by Sandy Kemsley at 01:46 PM in EnterpriseArchitecture • Rant | Digg This | Add to del.icio.us

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ebizq.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/185

Comments

Sandy,

Welcome to the world of tire-kickers! :)

If I had a dollar for every 'incident' I had like this in my many years as a consultant, I could retire. The worst ones are those that shop around and around, and we propose and propose and propose again, but they never buy for some reason that we'll never know.

I would chalk up these two previous clients as lacking a sense of urgency. If these issues were biting them in the posterior, you'd be on the next flight out pronto. Doesn't look like tht happened in either case.

Over time I've learned that good, serious business usually comes to me, not me to it. That doesn't mean I feel all high and mighty, it's simply a means of not wasting my time chasing nearly-dead projects or initiatives at comatose organizations whether I've worked with them previously or not.

Enjoy the rest of your weekend and regards,
Bob

Posted by: Bob McIlree at April 9, 2006 01:31 PM

Thanks for the comment, Bob. I've been doing this for almost 20 years now and it shouldn't bother me any more, but sometimes it just makes me shake my head and wonder.

I agree, most work comes to me now instead of me seeking it out. In the case of customer #2, that's what I thought was happening. In the case of customer #1, my email was more of a courtesy and intended to be something of value; obviously not, if it took them almost a year to open it!

No guesses about which customers will not be offered discounted rates in the future ;)

Posted by: Sandy Kemsley at April 9, 2006 04:29 PM

Sandy - I almost hate to admit this, but in my previous life as an IT buyer, I'd have proposals I really cared about sit on my desk for weeks on end, because every day brought a new fire to fight. Post fire fighting, I'd be shocked to see the proposal had aged so. Most often, I would get around to closing the deal. -brenda

ps - any chance you are attending this: http://www.globalintegrationsummit.com/

Posted by: brenda michelson at April 10, 2006 02:59 PM

Brenda, I don't have the illusion that my customers are just sitting idle at their desks, waiting for my email to arrive; however, an email along the lines of "sorry, I'm pretty busy right now, get back to you in a couple of weeks" would be good manners.

No plans to go to the Global Integration Summit.

Posted by: Sandy Kemsley at April 10, 2006 04:56 PM

oops... my comment must have read wrong... I knew you weren't under that illusion... and yes an email would absolutely be appropriate... what I was intending to say was sometimes a month (or two) would just fly by. now that I'm on the other side (awaiting the email) I feel the pain... payback! I think your "1 year to open" example must be close to a record. -brenda

Posted by: brenda michelson at April 10, 2006 05:29 PM

Most Recent ebizQ Blog Entries
ADVERTISEMENT

The content of all blog posts are copyright © 2007, Sandy Kemsley. All rights reserved. You may not reproduce any of these posts in their entirety without the author's express permission, although "fair use" excerpts are permitted as long as they include a link back to the original post.

Disclaimer:The opinions expressed in this blog are solely representative of the blog's author, and not of ebizQ.
Subscribe to our Newsletters
ebizQ Weekly Gold Club Update
Live Webinar Updates
Updates from ebizQ Partners
ebizQ SOA Update
ebizQ BPM Update
ebizQ Security Update
ebizQ BI Update
ebizQ Open Source Software Update
Virtual Show Newsletter
Your E-mail Address:
BAM: The Killer App for CEP
Date: Feb 12, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Event Processing Market Pulse
Date: Feb 14, 2008
Time: 12:00 PM ET
(17:00 GMT)

I WANT TO ATTEND
Archived Webinars | Upcoming Webinars

Marketing Solutions | Feedback | About ebizQ | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Site Map