We use cookies and other similar technologies (Cookies) to enhance your experience and to provide you with relevant content and ads. By using our website, you are agreeing to the use of Cookies. You can change your settings at any time. Cookie Policy.

Manage Tomorrow's Surprises Today

Steven Minsky

GRC Software: Why You Should Never Pay for Professional Services

Vote 0 Votes

Conservative estimates of GRC software implementations place the cost at either $200,000 or 50% of total licensing costs, whichever is greater. Even when initial costs are low, many vendors make up for apparent price reductions with professional services, or customizations, required to make the product work. Professional services are so ingrained in the software landscape that many organizations now consider them a necessary evil if they are to reap the benefits of GRC.

But you shouldn't be paying for them.

Professional services are the number-one reason prospective customers tell us they're unhappy with their current vendor, and are a huge contributing factor to awful customer satisfaction scores in recent studies of top GRC vendors.

Moreover, professional services put the onus for success on the customer. Can't figure out how to run a report? Don't worry; for $20,000, the vendor will generate it for you. Need to make changes to the workflow you first designed upon implementation? That's not a problem - all it will cost is money.

Worse than the hidden fees vendors build into their business models is the effect professional services have on the products themselves. By charging for professional services, the vendor creates a revenue stream that typically accounts for 50% of its annual revenue. Naturally, this discourages ease-of-use improvements. There's no incentive to make reports easy to generate, or workflows easy to edit, if the vendor can charge you for those customizations.

This inherent flaw with professional services affects the top criteria that businesses outline when selecting their GRC solution:

   1. Price

   2. Ease of Use

   3. Innovation

Why do so many companies, as evidenced by the bleak customer satisfaction rates for top GRC vendors, continue to make this mistake?
Professional Service Fees.jpg

First, many organizations don't realize there are alternatives. True software-as-a-service (SaaS) vendors will never charge professional services. Customizations aren't a source of revenue for SaaS GRC vendors, so the incentive is to make a flexible, easy-to-use product that can be configured by a single business administrator rather than a team of IT professionals.

Second, GRC vendors have created an awfully confusing market for buyers. Terms like SaaS, Hosted, and On-Premise are easily confused, as are the benefits associated with each. The solution to finding the right service is to ask if the vendor will charge for professional services. If the answer is yes, you're not subscribing to a true SaaS product. You are, however, subscribing to annual professional-service costs that are both large and hidden!

Third, "professional services" means unique, custom code for every customer. That slows down innovation, since each release needs to be tested against all existing professional-service work. Upgrades take 6 months to implement, and vendors' development budgets support multiple old versions of the product rather than future innovations.

These costs, of course, get passed back down to the customer in the form of professional-service fees! It's a vicious circle that can only be fixed by selecting a true SaaS vendor. Simple SaaS doesn't charge extra fees, whether for professional services, reporting, or anything else. Period.

It's that simple. Buyer beware.

Some organizations can afford the time and money necessary to make a GRC solution a palatable investment (even with costly professional services), but those companies tend to look more like the Bank of America's of the world than they do the Fortune 5 million. For most of us, it doesn't make sense to pay a dime for professional services.

Professional services ruin budgets. Once the non-SaaS product is in place, it needs to evolve; that's when hidden fees appear. They discourage enhancements that would make the product flexible and easy to use. They generate revenue for the vendor, but from services that should be complimentary with any solution. Only true SaaS vendors will readily give a money-back satisfaction guarantee, with no additional fees of any kind.


For more information about how and why LogicManager never charges for ongoing professional services, read about our free support and dedicated business analyst program. We're also transparent about our pricing, so click here to browse our packages and request a quote.

Leave a comment

In this blog, risk expert Steven Minsky highlights the differences between traditional risk management and true enterprise risk management, which is about helping things happen rather than preventing them from happening. Manage Tomorrow's Surprises Today is designed to help you think about risk in new ways and learn how to benefit practically from this rapidly evolving field.

Steven Minsky

Steven is the CEO of LogicManager, Inc. the leading provider of ERM software solutions. Steven is the architect of the RIMS Risk Maturity Model for ERM, author of the RIMS State of ERM Report among many other papers, and a RIMS Fellow (RF) instructor on ERM. Steven has conducted ERM and RIMS Risk Maturity Model training for hundreds of organizations around the globe. Steven is a patent author of risk and process management technology and holds MBA and MA degrees from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business and The Joseph H. Lauder Institute of International Management. You can reach Steven at steven.minsky@logicmanager.com.

Recently Commented On

Monthly Archives