We use cookies and other similar technologies (Cookies) to enhance your experience and to provide you with relevant content and ads. By using our website, you are agreeing to the use of Cookies. You can change your settings at any time. Cookie Policy.

Manage Tomorrow's Surprises Today

Steven Minsky

SEC Fines Investment Firm for Lying to Investors: How to Protect Your Company

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes
RCSA Image.jpg

I'm sure you're familiar with the game "Two Truths and a Lie." If not, here's how it is played; one person states three facts, and another person must guess which one of these three is a lie. Ready?

1. An investment firm attracted over $28 billion in five years using an investment strategy developed by a 20-year-old intern.

2. This investment firm was recently fined $35 million by the SEC for defrauding investors and presenting fabricated financial performance statistics to clients.

3.  News of the firm's fraudulent behavior significantly impacted business, bringing the firm's assets-under-management down $6.6 billion since October.

A $35 million fine by the SEC is a common enough occurrence to be true. And a fraudulent company losing business only makes sense, right? It would seem the first statement is a lie.

Not exactly. The firm was fined $35 million for defrauding investors, and it did use a 20 year old intern's investment strategy to bring in $28 billion in five years. The lie? Rather than losing business after the start of the SEC's investigation, the firm has continued to attract an additional $6.6 billion from investors.

As Stephen Gandel writes, "That might say something about Wall Street's marketing machine, the blindness of investors, or the combination of both factors." This "blindness of investors" is the most concerning element of the story. Even after the SEC announced its investigation into the investment firm for false claims, companies continued to pour their (and their clients') money into a flawed product, which begs the questions of whether the investors had done their proper due diligence.

Failing to recognize a firm's fraudulent practices is exactly why regulatory bodies like FINRA and the SEC have imposed an Enterprise Risk Management requirement on investment firms. Looking over a firm's product performance or marketing materials is simply not enough. Due diligence must involve a look into their past and present investing strategy, their leadership, and their relationship with regulators.

This is no longer a process that can be managed by a single employee with Google and Microsoft Excel. It is a complex, multi-layer process that can be burdensome without the proper tools. Due diligence, however, is also an opportunity. Proper investment firm due diligence enables firms to justify appropriate levels of risk taking, and provides evidence of risk-based decision making for examiners. Managing investment firms and their products with a software platform, as opposed to Excel or Word, allows you to run comprehensive reports, create analytical dashboards, and automate many of the day-to-day tasks involved in due diligence.

Taking a risk-based approach to due diligence and managing it within an effective enterprise risk management framework enables you to meet SEC, FINRA, and other regulator's compliance requirements, protecting your business's investments, reputation, and future.

For more information on how to get an ERM program and a compliant third-party due diligence program up and running in less than 90 days, download an overview of LogicManager's solution.

Leave a comment

In this blog, risk expert Steven Minsky highlights the differences between traditional risk management and true enterprise risk management, which is about helping things happen rather than preventing them from happening. Manage Tomorrow's Surprises Today is designed to help you think about risk in new ways and learn how to benefit practically from this rapidly evolving field.

Steven Minsky

Steven is the CEO of LogicManager, Inc. the leading provider of ERM software solutions. Steven is the architect of the RIMS Risk Maturity Model for ERM, author of the RIMS State of ERM Report among many other papers, and a RIMS Fellow (RF) instructor on ERM. Steven has conducted ERM and RIMS Risk Maturity Model training for hundreds of organizations around the globe. Steven is a patent author of risk and process management technology and holds MBA and MA degrees from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business and The Joseph H. Lauder Institute of International Management. You can reach Steven at steven.minsky@logicmanager.com.

Recently Commented On

Monthly Archives

Blogs

ADVERTISEMENT