ebizQ's Business Agility Watch

Peter Schooff

Does Good SOA Have to Mean Bad Security? A Talk With the Open Group

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

Editor's Note: Interested in SOA, security, and business collaboration, then make sure to attend Open Group's webinar, Evolving Security Architectures and SOA for Better Business Collaboration by clicking right here.

What follows is my podcast with Fred Etemadieh, Chairman of the SOA Security Working Group for the Open Group. Fred has over 25 years of experience in the Open Source Systems Development with UNIX and Linux, and in this podcast we discuss the intersection of SOA, security, and collaboration, and Fred gives a quick introduction to the Open Group's upcoming Webinar on Wednesday, August 6, Evolving Security Architectures and SOA, where Fred will be a featured speaker.

Listen to or download the 5:01 minute podcast below:



Download file

---Transcript---

What will people learn from this Webinar and who exactly should attend?

The intent of this Webinar is to introduce a merger of two primary IT ideas. One is the SOA or Service Oriented Architecture and the other one is the security characteristics within the IT environment. And as we all know, SOA is gaining grounds in the architectural community and the security has always been traditionally and to this day a main part of the IT infrastructure. And as such, we think that it is as good of a time as any to introduce a cohesive simple understanding of these two primary features of an IT infrastructure in this Webinar.

Because SOA represents a different way of constructing applications, does that mean the security threats and vulnerabilities are different then as well?

Indeed it does. SOA has a certain characteristics that is common regardless of who is attempting to define it. Needless to say, given that it is a relatively new architecture, you will have varying definitions of what SOA components comprise of. However, in all of these definitions, a couple of items come to mind. SOA is a distributed environment.

And more importantly, the information that traditionally had been part of an internal IT organization, an internal corporate framework is now being scattered all over the internet. And therefore, the nature of information needs to maintained as far as the confidentiality is concerned, and indemnity is concerned, and a bunch of other features, which in the past were not necessarily at the forefront of security definition and design.

Right. So it sounds like its calling for new security solutions and new architectural responses. But then do you see an evolution in terms of the appropriate response for securing SOA architectures over time?

I think evolution is a proper term as opposed to total overhaul. I think that the existing security features within the IT need to evolve to take into account the nature of the SOA architecture. And SOA architecture is coming into to the picture as we speak within small and large organizations.

More and more companies are interacting with one another in an internet connectivity as opposed to internet or within the same realm of the security. So as it grows, and grows, and grows, we need to evolve the requirements, and more importantly, keep them in check so it's not scattered all over and the companies can interact with one another.

Well, that makes a lot of sense. Now, one of SOA's biggest challenges seems to me to be with identity. So what exactly are the SOA security implications for identity management services and technologies?

Well, that's an excellent question. Imagine if you're within a single organization, and you have an identity, and you go out and you have own other identities when you're dealing with other organizations.

But in this instance, the nature of identity can be very convoluted if we leave it the old traditional way of identifying either one as an individual, or a feature, or a process in that it needs to be more uniformly defined across the net in that it makes it more -- simplifies the process of exchanging information, recognizing where the information is coming from, authenticating where the information is coming from.

All these characteristics that belong inherently to an identification become important in developing and generating an unified means of defining and implementing these features of identification. There are organizations that are working towards federated identity, which some people might have heard which is concentrating on defining and promoting what is global identities recommended to be.

This is ebizQ's Peter Schooff having spoken with Fred Etemadieh, Chairman of the SOA Security Working Group for the Open Group. If you have any questions, make sure to log on right here and ask the question so it then can be addressed during the Webinar. Thank you so very much for joining me today, Fred.

Leave a comment

ebizQ’s expert blog team covers a broad range of BPM, business integration, business analytics/monitoring, collaboration, content and related issues.

Peter Schooff

Peter Schooff is Contributing Editor at ebizQ, and manager of the ebizQ Forum. Contact him at pschooff@techtarget.com

Kaitlin Brunsden

Kaitlin Brunsden is assistant editor at ebizQ. She attended SUNY Purchase and graduated with a degree in Creative Writing and a minor in Photography. Prior to joining ebizQ, Kaitlin worked as a copy editor for The Submission and Italics Mine! magazines. She can be reached at kbrunsden@techtarget.com.

Recently Commented On

Tag Cloud

#sweettweets, #w2e, 2010 bi predictions, 7, AADI, ActionBaes, ActionBase, Active Endpoints, Adaptive Process Guidance, Advanced SOA, Agile, Agility, Amberpoint, amberpoint, amy lipton, Anatoly Belychook, andrew smith, Andrew Smith, apache, APG, Appian, Appian Anywhere, Application Architecture Development and Integration Summit, architecture, Ashesh Badani, Autonomy, b2b, BEI, Best Practices, bi, BI, BI Forum, BI in 2010, BI Podcast, BizFeed, BizSensors, BonitaSoft, bpm, BPM, BPM forum, BPM in Action, BPM Podcast, BPM podcast, bpm podcast, BPM ROI, BPMN, Brian Gentile, Bryan Cheung, business, Business Console, business intelligence, Buzz, CALIBRE systems, CALIBRE Systems, Calvin Fudge, case management, case management podcast, castiron acquistions ibm, CEO, CFO, Channel Organizations, China, Clay Richardson, cloud, Cloud, Cloud 9, Cloud BI, Cloud changing IT, Cloud Computing, cloud computing, Cloud Forum, Cloud Governance, cloud podcast, Cloud Podcast, Cloud podcast, collaboration, conference, Connie Moore, Consected, Content Management, content management, Corticon, Courion, craig le clair, crm, CRM, customer relationship management, Data Direct, data warehousing, David Gilmour, David Linthicum, David Ulevitch, Decision Management Solutions, Derek Miers, Dr. Alexander Samarin, Dr. Ivan Misner, Dr. K Mani Chandy, Dr. Rado Kotorov, DW, Dynamic Applications, dynamic case management, Dynamic SOA, e-discovery, EA, EAI, ebizq, ebizQ Forum, ebizq newsite, ebizQ Podcast, ECM, ecology, EDA, enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Architecture, enterprise irregulars, Eric Payeur, esb, Event Driven Architecture, Event Processing, Facebook, federal, fidelis security systems, forrester, Forrester, Forum, Fujitsu, Garth Gehlbach, gartner, Gartner, Gartner AADI, Gartner BPM Summit, gartner bpm summit, Gaurish Vijay Hattangadi, Global 360, Gmail, Gomez, Gooddata, Google, Google Buzz, Google DNS, Google vs. China, Gordon Van Huizen, governance, government, Government, Green Tech, Greg Goldfarb, Ground-Floor BPM, holistic bpm, Human Process Management, Hyland Software, Ian Gotts, ibm, IBM, IBM Rational, Imad Mouline, impact 2009, Information Builders, Infostreet, infosys podcast, innovation, Innovative Process Consulting, iqu, IT, IT Business Managment, IT productivity, iTKO, itko, JackBe, Jacob Ukelson, James Taylor, Jason Bloomberg, Jaspersoft, jboss, Jeff Kaplan, jignesh shah, Jim Rudden, John Crupi, John Michelsen, John Thompson, JP Morgenthal, Kalido, Kathy Long, Keith Swenson, Kickfire, Kognitio, Laserfiche, les yeamans, liferay, Lombardi, lotus, M-Dot, Mainframe, Malcolm Ross, management, Mani Chandy, Marc Benioff, mashups, master data management, Matthew W. Calkins, MDM, mdm, Merger, Metastorm, Micro Focus, microsoft, Microsoft, middleware, Miguel Valdes-Faura, Mike Kavis, Miko Matsumura, mobile crm, Most Popular Forums, mulesoft, MWD, MWD Advisors, Neil Ward-Dutton, Nenshad Bardoliwalla, Networking Like a Pro, newsfeed, Nimbus, Nimbus Partners, Norman Nie, one degree consulting, One Degree Consulting, online communities, OnStrategies, Open Source, Open Source BI, OpenDNS, oracle, Oracle, Ovum, partnerpedia, Persona-Based BPM, Peter Schooff, Phil Ayres, Pierre Fricke, Podcast, podcast, Portals. Ken Burns, Predictive Analytics, process design, process discovery, process governance, process improvement, Process Management, process management, Process Management Software, process modeling, process quality, process quality management, Progress, Progress buys Savvion, Progress Software, Pure Play, QinetiQ, Quality Assurance, redhat, Revolution Analytics, Ribbit, Rich Caplow, Rob Koplowitz, Roman Stanek, SaaS, SaaS BPM, Salesforce, Samir Gulati, sandbox, SAP, Savvion, Scott Hebner, Scott Menter, See Think Do, show, siamak farah, soa, SOA, SOA Forum, soa in action, SOA in action, SOA in Action, SOA in Action Virtual Conference, SOA success, SOA testing, SOA Validation, soap, Social BPM, social media, Social Media, social networking, software ag, Software AG, Soumadeep Sen, source code, SquareTwo Financial, Stephanie Quick, Stephen Chan, Steve Weissman, Sun, Swayne Hill, Sybase, Tarak Modi, taraneon, the Holly Group, ThinkStrategies, Thinkstrategies, Thomas Olbrich, Thomas Wayman, Tivoli, Tony Baer, travel, twitter, Twitter, vista, Wave, web 2.0, Web 2.0, web services, weblayers, windows, wozniak, xp, Yefim Natis, ZapThink, ZL Technologies,

Monthly Archives

Blogs

ADVERTISEMENT